Stress pshcyology

A regularity of managing focal point is hardiness training au whencetic by kobasa in 1979 here this system works by assessing peoples trains of hardiness then offering them a series of increase that hardiness here they try to modification the way the person appraises the threat level of the stressor and their ability to cope with it.(ii) Outline unriv on the wholeed limitation of this rule. (3 marks)A limitation to this method is that it takes a lot of time and cash and you have to show a full(prenominal) level of commitment to the process.(b) Describe the procedures and call backings of angiotensin-converting enzyme analyse of the workplace as a source of stress. (6 marks)Johansson (1978) took 2 roots of workers at a Swedish saw mill, one was a group of 14 finishers this job was clamant and isolated but very passing skilled. The new(prenominal) group were the low take a chance of 10 cleaners whose work was to a greater extent than varied and largely self paced th ey were in any case allowed to socialize more with the other workers.To find out the stress levels Johansson recorded levels of stress hormones on work days and remnant days, he rig that the high pretend group of finishers secreted more stress connect hormones on work days than on rest days and higher(prenominal)(prenominal) levels than that of those in the control group of cleaners, the finishers alike showed more signs of stress related symptoms e.g. Headaches and a higher case of absenteeism than that of the cleaners.(c) Discuss investigate into the race between stress and cardiovascular disorders.(18 marks) there have been many studies undertaking research into the correlation between cardiovascular disorders and stress.Friedman and Rosenman undertook a study into coronary softheartedness affection (CHD) in 1959, their hypothesis was that patients who displayed guinea pig A behaviour who fitted into the group that had a conventionality of impatience, competitiveness and hostility where more app atomic number 18nt to get CHD than those who fitted into the event B group these displayed a pattern of being pose back and relaxed.Friedman and Rosenman took a sample of 3000 males from California, regular army aged between 39 and 59, who were ruddy at the start of the study, they established which reputation group the sample fitted into through a series of questions put forward in an interview.Friedman and Rosenman found that after eight and a half years 257 men in the sample were diagnosed with CHD and that of this group 70% had been previously classed as a attribute A genius. They also found hat type As had a higher level of cholesterol and that twice as many men in the type A group had died compared to the type B group.Friedman and Rosenman concluded that Type A personality is more likely to be associated with CHD. Be serve type A is also linked to other factors that cause CHD, such as sens (which we now cheat can cause CHD), it is not ce rtain if type A is a direct or confirmatory cause of CHD.Cirtisms of this study include that it is an exceedingly biased sample, with the sample being all males from California this means it lacks population rigor.It is also critised due to the fact that it is not know whether CHD is brought on souly from the type of personality you are as Friedman and Rosenman concluded there were a series of extraneous variables that could not be controlled in this study i.e. smoking.It is classed as over simplistic with the sample being classed as one or the other as there are only two choices.Positive critisms of this study include that it has a large sample at 3000 males and that it was a longditudinal study running for 8 1/2 years.Other studies that back up friedman and Rosenman into stress and the effect on the cardiovascular system are that of Williams who conducted a study on 13000 people, he got the sample to choose in a questionnaire which consisted of 10 questions and lay them on a n anger scale. He found that six years later of the 13000 sampled he found 256 had have gotd a heart attack and that those who scored most highly on the anger scale were nearly three times more likely to experience one. This study has good time validity as it was carried out in 2000.